UEFA Champions League 2024/2025 – League Phase Draw
The 2024/25 UEFA Champions League league phase draw, a historic first under the new format, took place from 18:00 CET on Thursday 29 August.
DRAW PROCEDURE
Match system
All league phase matches are played in accordance with the league system, whereby each club plays eight opponents in single-leg ties. Each club plays four home and four away matches.
Draw system and conditions
A draw, which may be conducted digitally, determines the pairings for the league phase. The 36 clubs were divided into four pots of nine clubs. The pots were composed according to the club coefficient rankings established at the beginning of the season (see Annex D) and with the UEFA Champions League titleholder being the top seed in pot 1.
The opponents of each team, as well as whether each match is played at home or away, were determined by means of a draw. Each team was drawn against two opponents from each of the four pots and plays one opponent from each pot at home, and the other away. In principle, teams from the same association cannot be drawn against each other and each team may play against a maximum of two opponents from any other one association, subject to Paragraph 16.03.
The UEFA administration may determine alternative conditions for the draw in accordance with the principles set by the Club Competitions Committee and may adapt any of the conditions of the draw to avoid deadlock situations and/or take into account any relevant constraints in light of decisions taken by the UEFA Executive Committee.
Draw system
The draw was executed partly manually, with balls physically drawn from a bowl, and partly digitally, through a designated automated software, as further explained in the procedure below. The whole draw process (digital and manual) was reviewed and checked by an appointed external auditor.
Pots
Pot 1
1. Real Madrid C.F. (ESP)
2. Manchester City (ENG)
3. FC Bayern München (GER)
4. Paris Saint-Germain (FRA)
5. Liverpool FC (ENG)
6. FC Internazionale Milano (ITA)
7. Borussia Dortmund (GER)
8. RB Leipzig (GER)
9. FC Barcelona (ESP)
Pot 2
10. Bayer 04 Leverkusen (GER)
11. Atlético de Madrid (ESP)
12. Atalanta BC (ITA)
13. Juventus (ITA)
14. SL Benfica (POR)
15. Arsenal FC (ENG)
16. Club Brugge KV (BEL)
17. FC Shakhtar Donetsk (UKR)
18. AC Milan (ITA)
Pot 3
19. Feyenoord (NED)
20. Sporting Clube de Portugal (POR)
21. PSV Eindhoven (NED)
22. GNK Dinamo (CRO)
23. FC Salzburg (AUT)
24. LOSC Lille (FRA)
25. FK Crvena Zvezda (SRB)
26. BSC Young Boys (SUI)
27. Celtic FC (SCO)
Pot 4
28. ŠK Slovan Bratislava (SVK)
29. AS Monaco (FRA)
30. AC Sparta Praha (CZE)
31. Aston Villa FC (ENG)
32. Bologna FC 1909 (ITA)
33. Girona FC (ESP)
34. VfB Stuttgart (GER)
35. SK Sturm Graz (AUT)
36. Stade Brestois 29 (FRA)
Draw procedure
Four bowls were prepared for the draw, one for each of the four draw pots. Each bowl comprised nine balls containing the names of the teams forming the pot.
Pot 1
A ball was physically drawn at random from the relevant bowl and was opened to display the name of the team drawn.
Once the name of the team was displayed, the automated software randomly drew eight opponents for this team, two from each pot (1, 2, 3 and 4), including, for each opponent, whether they were played at home or away. The order of allocation of opponents started with pot 1 (two opponents), followed by the other pots in descending order. The software drew the possible valid opponents from all pots respecting the above-mentioned draw conditions, and ensured that a valid allocation was made, guaranteeing the full draw and match schedule in line with the competition calendar could be completed for all teams. This allocation by the software was made within a predefined time limit.
Once a valid allocation was drawn by the software, the opponents and which matches are played at home or away were revealed.
The procedure was then repeated for all remaining teams of pot 1.
While proceeding with the draw, a number of opponents had already been drawn and directly displayed, so reducing the number of opponents to be drawn for the subsequent teams.
Pot 2
As for pot 1, a ball was physically drawn at random from the relevant bowl and was opened to display the name of the team drawn.
The two opponents of pot 1 for this team were already determined during the draw for pot 1 teams.
The software therefore drew, with the same procedure as described for pot 1, two opponents from each of the remaining pots (2, 3 and 4), including, for each opponent, whether they were played at home or away.
The procedure was then repeated for the remaining teams of pot 2.
Pot 3
The procedure was the same as for pot 1 and pot 2. Only opponents from pots 3 and 4 needed to be drawn.
Pot 4
The procedure was the same as for the previous pots. Only opponents from pot 4 needed to be drawn.
